Peer Reviewers

JUNEDIK • EDITORIAL QUALITY

Peer Reviewers

Our reviewer directory reflects scholarly collaboration and a commitment to objective, confidential, and constructive manuscript assessment.

Peer-review integrity

JUNEDIK follows a double-blind peer-review policy. Reviewers are selected according to subject expertise, independence, and potential conflicts of interest. Inclusion in this directory does not indicate involvement in reviewing any particular submission.

Reviewer Directory

26 listed reviewers • Academic profiles and institutional affiliations

REVIEWER 01 • INDONESIA

Masriadi

Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57193857446 →
REVIEWER 02 • INDONESIA

Muzakkir

Institut Nani Hasanuddin, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57193849878 →
REVIEWER 03 • MALAYSIA

Khin Thandar Aung

College of Nursing, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia

Google Scholar →
REVIEWER 04 • TAIWAN

Ching-Min Chen

Department of Nursing, Institute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

Scopus ID: 57154846200 →
REVIEWER 05 • NORTH MACEDONIA

Mirko Spiroski

Scientific Foundation SPIROSKI, Skopje, North Macedonia

Scopus ID: 6602348069 →
REVIEWER 06 • IRAQ

Ayad F. Alkaim

College of Science for Women, Babylon, Iraq

Scopus ID: 55255310600 →
REVIEWER 07 • INDONESIA

Henny Dwi Susanti

Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, East Java, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57221678781 →
REVIEWER 08 • INDONESIA

Gading Ekapuja Aurizki

Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57201187775 →
REVIEWER 09 • MALAYSIA

Ismarulyusda Binti Ishak

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

Scopus ID: 55433903700 →
REVIEWER 10 • INDONESIA

Dito Anurogo

Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57224408026 →
REVIEWER 11 • INDONESIA

Nurul Huda

Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 6701695514 →
REVIEWER 12 • PHILIPPINES

Joy Rey Acob

Visayas State University, Baybay City, Philippines

Scopus ID: 57204961499 →
REVIEWER 13 • MALAYSIA

NurZetty Sofia Zainuddin

Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia

Scopus ID: 57208275612 →
REVIEWER 14 • INDONESIA

Yusriani

Universitas Muslim Indonesia, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57204969624 →
REVIEWER 15 • INDONESIA

Hendrik

Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57204567501 →
REVIEWER 16 • INDONESIA

Arwan

Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57212211462 →
REVIEWER 17 • INDONESIA

Sainal Edi Kamal

Politeknik Sandi Karsa, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57226238006 →
REVIEWER 18 • INDONESIA

Ayuda Nia Agustina

Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Fatmawati, Jakarta, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57722814200 →
REVIEWER 19 • INDONESIA

Ryryn Suryaman Prana Putra

Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57245732900 →
REVIEWER 20 • INDONESIA

Fitriani Nur Damayanti

Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57208206192 →
REVIEWER 21 • INDONESIA

Nanang Kurnia Achmadi

Politeknik Harapan Bersama, Tegal, Central Java, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57209460859 →
REVIEWER 22 • INDONESIA

Nur'Aini Purnamaningsih

Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57204505830 →
REVIEWER 23 • INDONESIA

Nasrul

Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia

Scopus ID: 57215120709 →
REVIEWER 24 • INDONESIA

Hasbi Ibrahim

Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Google Scholar →
REVIEWER 25 • INDONESIA

Abubakar Betan

STIKES Gunung Sari, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Google Scholar →
REVIEWER 26 • INDONESIA

Haslinah

Universitas Aufa Royhan di Kota Padangsidimpuan, North Sumatra, Indonesia

Google Scholar →

Reviewer Ethics and Editorial Independence

Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality, disclose relevant conflicts of interest, evaluate manuscripts fairly, and provide evidence-based feedback. Editors retain responsibility for final publication decisions.

The directory is provided for transparency. Reviewer assignments and confidential reports are not publicly disclosed.

Profile links and affiliations are provided as supplied to the journal and should be periodically verified by the editorial office. Listing does not imply endorsement by Scopus.