Digital Transformation and Collaborative Innovation Public Health Services in Indonesia: A Qualitative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61099/jih.v2i2.253Keywords:
Collaborative Innovation, Digital Health, Health Governance, Public Health ServicesAbstract
Introduction: Digital transformation has emerged as a strategic approach to improve efficiency, accessibility, and data-driven decision-making in public health services. However, the implementation of digital health initiatives often faces institutional, governance, and coordination challenges. In addition, technological adoption alone may not guarantee sustainable improvements without collaborative innovation among stakeholders. This study aimed to explore how digital transformation and collaborative innovation interact in shaping public health service delivery.
Research Methodology: This study employed a qualitative research design using a multiple case study approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis involving 18 stakeholders, including policymakers, public health managers, healthcare professionals, information technology personnel, and community representatives. Participants were selected using purposive sampling based on their involvement in digital health initiatives. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis supported by NVivo software, with triangulation applied to enhance the credibility of findings.
Results: The study identified four major themes influencing digital transformation in public health services: digital infrastructure readiness, collaborative innovation among stakeholders, institutional and governance challenges, and perceived impacts on service delivery. Participants emphasized that integrated health information systems improved reporting efficiency and program monitoring. However, challenges related to system interoperability, regulatory fragmentation, and institutional coordination were reported as barriers to effective implementation.
Conclusion: Digital transformation in public health services is shaped by the interaction between technological infrastructure, collaborative innovation, and governance capacity. Strengthening digital health governance, promoting cross-sector collaboration, and improving institutional digital capacity are essential to ensure sustainable and effective digital health implementation.
Downloads
References
[1] M. A. Alsafran, Y. A. Awad, A. Alsaber, S. Almutairi, and A. Al-Kandari, “Assessing gamification and corporate sustainability: the role of embracing digital transformation and open innovation in ecosystem,” Manag. Sustain. An Arab Rev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 427–451, Mar. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-11-2024-0196.
[2] P. Alves et al., “An Ecosystem Approach to Developing and Implementing a Cocreated Bachelor’s Degree in Digital Health and Biomedical Innovation,” JMIR Med. Educ., vol. 11, pp. e63903–e63903, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/63903.
[3] U. Awan, S. Shamim, M. Rahman, and E. Aydin, “Integrating the circular economy into public organisations: The impact of digital transformations and circular insights on resource-conscious innovative behaviour,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 222, p. 124388, Jan. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124388.
[4] F. Casalini and L. Zavolokina, “From private platforms to public value: An exploratory analysis of privately-owned public service digital platforms in Italy,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 42, no. 4, p. 102090, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102090.
[5] Y.-T. Chang, H.-W. Lo, and S.-W. Lin, “Analyzing the interrelationships of evaluation indicators in the open data services industry’s efforts toward digital transformation: A novel group decision-making approach,” Technol. Soc., vol. 82, p. 102880, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102880.
[6] N. Chen, Y. Hu, and L. Wang, “Enhancing enterprises’ green and low-carbon innovation through digital technology embeddedness: From passive response to active innovation,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 10, no. 5, p. 100801, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100801.
[7] L. M. A. de M. Correia and A. G. Frank, “Structuring resources in healthcare digital transformation: a comparison across public, private and research hospitals,” Technovation, vol. 147, p. 103320, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103320.
[8] R. Fioravanti, O. F. L. Jr, M. M. Giset, and J. A. Pinto, “ULaaS: Urban Logistics as a Service – a conceptual platform for digital transformation of logistics services in urban areas,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 82, pp. 1369–1383, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2024.12.130.
[9] S. Hafeez, K. Shahzad, P. Helo, and M. F. Mubarak, “Knowledge management and SMEs’ digital transformation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 100728, May 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100728.
[10] S. Kang and Y. Shang, “Exploring the sustainable development path of global digital service trade stability: A hybrid approach perspective,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 169, p. 114172, Apr. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2026.114172.
[11] L. Liu, L. Zhou, P. Sharma, E. A. Alzeiby, and S. Dash, “Triple helix trust and spillovers for sustainable innovation: The role of governance, openness, and digital infrastructure,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 225, p. 124548, Apr. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124548.
[12] F. Marchesani and F. Ceci, “A quadruple helix view on smart city: Exploring the effect of internal and external open innovation on public services digitalization,” Technovation, vol. 139, p. 103141, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103141.
[13] A. Peša, S. B. Valčić, and Z. Bubaš, “Positive and negative narratives in the service of digital currencies as disruptive innovation,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 100723, Mar. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100723.
[14] F. Pobee, A. B. Jibril, A. A. Shaikh, A. Turginbayeva, Z. Issayeva, and G. Mutanov, “Driving digital transformation in government services in Ghana: A value-creation perspective,” Meas. Digit., vol. 5, p. 100019, Mar. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meadig.2025.100019.
[15] I. N. Rachmania, G. Yudoko, M. H. Basri, and S. Novani, “Systemic digital co-creation framework for unified electronic health record implementation: A case study in Indonesia,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 100743, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100743.
[16] Y. Zhou, W. He, H. Tang, and Y. Liu, “From complexity to strength: How digital transformation and innovation enhances agricultural supply chain resilience?,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 15, p. 100985, Jul. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2026.100985.
[17] N. Shen, L. Zhang, Q. Wang, and L. Wu, “The power of institutional innovation in the urban carbon unlocking: A study on collaborative empowerment of digital policy and new energy policy,” Energy Policy, vol. 206, p. 114721, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114721.
[18] S. Suprapto, “Relationship between knowledge level and contraceptive compliance among family planning acceptors: A Cross-Sectional Study,” J. Interdiscip. Heal., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–34, Jan. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.61099/jih.v2i1.175.
[19] S. Suprapto, “Health policy analysis of universal coverage implementation in national health systems and services governance financing,” JAKESPOL J. Heal. Policy Anal., vol. 1, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 1–8, Jan. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.61099/jakespol.v1i1.190.
[20] A. E. Young et al., “Co-Design of a Digital Health Platform for Chronic Disease Management in Rural Settings Using a Person-Centered, Collaborative-Care Model: Protocol for a 3-Phase Mixed Methods Study,” JMIR Res. Protoc., vol. 14, p. e77844, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/77844.
[21] S. Suprapto and Y. Kadang, “Effectiveness Of Nursing Interventions in The Implementation of Primary Health Care Policies: A Systematic Review,” Maj. Kesehat. Indones., vol. 7, no. 1 SE-Review Articles, pp. 21–30, Jan. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.47679/makein.2026282.
[22] U. Tanveer, T. G. Hoang, S. Ishaq, and R. U. Khalid, “Public-private partnerships as catalysts for digital transformation and circular economy: Insights from developing countries,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 219, p. 124270, Oct. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124270.
[23] P. Trein, B. Presset, and T. Vagionaki, “Parallel learning loops in collaborative innovation: Insights from digital government,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 42, no. 4, p. 102080, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102080.
[24] H. Van Roekel, M. Branderhorst, L. Tummers, and A. Meijer, “Digital transformation leadership: A public value-centered measurement scale,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 42, no. 4, p. 102091, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102091.
[25] Y. Wang and Q. Lin, “Coupling coordination analysis between public sports service equalization and the digital economy,” Financ. Res. Lett., vol. 85, p. 107834, Nov. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107834.
[26] Y. Wang, C. Huang, X. Ye, and J. Zhang, “Linkage and coordination: Industrial digital transformation from the perspective of innovation ecosystem,” Technovation, vol. 144, p. 103228, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103228.
[27] J. Wu, “Bluer rural skies through digital government transformation: Evidence from a mixed methods study,” J. Rural Stud., vol. 122, p. 103999, Feb. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.103999.
[28] C. Yang, H. Luo, S. Yang, L. Li, and Q. Liu, “Digital platforms and smart city synergies: Unlocking cross-sector innovation and governance in urban transformation,” Technovation, vol. 147, p. 103307, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103307.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Suprapto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Statement:
The authors retain the copyright of this work and grant Journal Interdisciplinary Health the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the initial publication in this journal are properly credited.
The authors are permitted to copy and redistribute the published version of the work, including posting it to an institutional repository or including it in a book, with acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal Interdisciplinary Health.













