Quantitative analysis of cerebral carotid CTA image quality and radiation dose at low kv and standard kv variations using bolus tracking technique

Olivia Ganna; Akhirida Putri; Wenda Anastasia; Suherman Hardi Saputro; Mira Maya Kumala; Nurwahyu; Purwanto; Muhammad Saifur Rohmad

doi:10.61099/jih.v2i1.301

Authors

Olivia Ganna Department of Radiological Imaging Technology, Politeknik Sandi Karsa, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Indonesia
Akhirida Putri Department of Radiological Imaging Technology, Politeknik Sandi Karsa, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Indonesia
Wenda Anastasia Department of Radiological Imaging Technology, Politeknik Sandi Karsa, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Indonesia
Suherman Hardi Saputro Department of Radiological Imaging Technology, Politeknik Sandi Karsa, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Indonesia
Mira Maya Kumala Department of Radiological Imaging Technology, Politeknik Sandi Karsa, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Indonesia
Nurwahyu Department of Radiological Imaging Technology, Politeknik Sandi Karsa, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Indonesia
Purwanto Department of Radiological Imaging Technology, Politeknik Sandi Karsa, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Indonesia
Muhammad Saifur Rohmad Department of Radiological Imaging Technology, Politeknik Sandi Karsa, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61099/jih.v2i1.301

Keywords:

Angiography, Computed Tomography, Carotid Arteries, Radiation Dosage, Signal-to-Noise Ratio, X-Ray Tube Voltage

Abstract

Introduction: Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) of the cerebral carotid arteries is a key non-invasive modality for evaluating vascular abnormalities. Image quality and radiation dose are strongly influenced by tube voltage (kVp). Lower tube voltage may enhance iodine attenuation and reduce radiation exposure. This study aimed to compare vascular image quality and radiation dose between low tube voltage (70 kVp) and standard tube voltage (100 kVp) in cerebral carotid CTA using bolus tracking.

Research Methodology: A quantitative comparative retrospective study was conducted on 20 patients, divided into two groups: 70 kVp (n=10) and 100 kVp (n=10). Image quality was assessed using arterial enhancement (Hounsfield Unit, HU) and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) measured at the ascending aorta, common carotid artery, and middle cerebral artery using Region of Interest (ROI) analysis. Radiation dose parameters included CTDIvol and Dose Length Product (DLP). Data normality was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk, followed by the the Mann–Whitney and independent t-test for comparative analysis.

Results: The 70 kVp protocol significantly increased arterial enhancement (e.g., ascending aorta: 697.36±81.06 HU vs 328.25±34.75 HU) and SNR (29.43±16.29 vs 15.68±7.95) compared to 100 kVp (p < 0.05). Radiation dose was substantially reduced, with CTDIvol decreasing from 8.08 mGy to 2.82 mGy and DLP from 284.66±10.92 mGy·cm to 102.12±3.08 mGy·cm (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Low tube voltage (70 kVp) significantly improves vascular image quality while reducing radiation dose in cerebral carotid CTA. This protocol supports radiation optimization principles and can be considered an effective alternative in clinical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. F. Bouloux et al., “Management of Patients With Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 1078.e1-1078.e83, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2024.03.018.

M. Nakashima et al., “Metal artifact reduction from surgical clips for intracranial aneurysms in photon-counting detector CT angiography,” Eur. J. Radiol., vol. 192, p. 112411, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112411.

J. Huang, M. Wang, T. Wang, Y. Lin, Y. Fang, and J. Xie, “Perfusion-derived cerebral CT angiography with artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction as a replacement for routine cerebral CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke,” Eur. J. Radiol., p. 112819, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112819.

A. S. Shanshool, S. Ziaee, M. A. Ansari, and V. V Tuchin, “Advances in the transport of laser radiation to the brain with optical clearing: From simulation to reality,” Prog. Quantum Electron., vol. 94, p. 100506, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2024.100506.

G. Shu et al., “Metallic artifacts-free spectral computed tomography angiography based on renal clearable bismuth chelate,” Biomaterials, vol. 305, p. 122422, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122422.

M. M. Khan, P. Mondel, and H. Yuan, “Neuroimaging and Diagnostic Workup for Headache,” Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 677–699, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2025.07.001.

R. Sun et al., “Feasibility of single-phase DECT as an alternative to triple-phase CT for imaging-defined risk factors assessment in neuroblastoma for dose reduction,” Eur. J. Radiol. Open, vol. 16, p. 100732, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2026.100732.

L. Tao et al., “Performance of deep-learning reconstruction combined with metal artifact reduction algorithm for dual-energy computed tomography angiography in intracranial aneurysm coil embolization,” Eur. J. Radiol. Open, vol. 16, p. 100715, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100715.

C. Russo et al., “Window self-attention and 3D volumetric refinement for large vessel occlusion detection in brain angiography,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 199, pp. 27–33, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2025.10.019.

F. Wang et al., “Move-contrast 4D angiographic reconstruction of computed tomography perfusion data,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 112, p. 108580, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108580.

H. Li et al., “Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) Algorithm to Maintain High Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy in Quadruple-low CT Angiography of Children with Pulmonary Sequestration: A Case Control Study,” Acad. Radiol., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 4197–4205, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.005.

H. Wu et al., “Application of bolus tracking: The effect of ROI positions on the images quality of cervicocerebral CT angiography,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 7, p. e29260, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29260.

S. Perumal Sankar, R. Vinu, S. Sreelekshmi, and N. Viswanath, “Optimized neural network for vulnerable plaque detection in OCT images with noise tolerance and adaptive coefficient zeroing,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 100, p. 107046, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107046.

A. Abaid, M. A. Farooq, N. Hynes, P. Corcoran, and I. Ullah, “DiffusionTBAD: Rendering CTA images for type B aortic dissection diagnosis,” Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., vol. 130, p. 102740, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2026.102740.

C. Talele et al., “Cancer-testis antigens (CTAs) in lung cancer,” Clin. Chim. Acta, vol. 579, p. 120687, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2025.120687.

A. Adhami, A. Hamzehlouy, J. Towfighi, and M. Soroush, “Modeling and optimization of PVDF-based polymer inclusion membranes for high-selectivity calcium-ion separation,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 530, p. 173301, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2026.173301.

M. Aehle et al., “Progress in end-to-end optimization of fundamental physics experimental apparata with differentiable programming,” Rev. Phys., vol. 13, p. 100120, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revip.2025.100120.

H. An, S. Lee, H. Hwang, E. Kim, J. Kim, and Y. Jung, “Clinical decision support system for comprehensive analysis and long-term surveillance of post-endovascular repair in abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 326, p. 114026, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2025.114026.

X. Bao, C. Liu, Z. Zhang, and W. Zhang, “Structure-aware chain-of-thought for interpretable few-shot coronary CTA segmentation,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 316, p. 131821, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2026.131821.

S. F. Hameedat, Y. Md Radzi, M. D. Salman, M. A. Alshipli, and A. F. Hmaidat, “A scoping review of radiation dose and image quality in paediatric CT: Towards safe imaging protocols and diagnostic reference levels in Jordan,” J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Sci., vol. 57, no. 3, p. 102207, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2026.102207.

H. Wu, T. Chen, L. Wang, and L. Guo, “Speed and accuracy in Tandem: Deep Learning-Powered Millisecond-Level pulmonary embolism detection in CTA,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 106, p. 107792, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107792.

L. Feng et al., “DiffCTA: Diffusion model-based non-contrast CT angiography with contrast-enhanced mask guidance,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 112, p. 108645, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108645.

N. L. Wankhede et al., “Neuroimaging biomarkers: a critical review of their role in neurological disease diagnosis and management,” Brain Disord., vol. 18, p. 100222, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dscb.2025.100222.

A. Gladston, S. Velraj, and H. Nadarajan, “Hybrid Multi-Scale 3D Segmentation Framework for Automated Stenosis Detection,” Congenit. Heart Dis., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 769–792, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.32604/chd.2025.068879.

C. Wang et al., “Optimization of carotid CT angiography image quality with deep learning image reconstruction with high setting (DLIR-H) algorithm under ultra-low radiation and contrast agent conditions,” Radiography, vol. 31, no. 6, p. 103154, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.103154.